Monday, June 25, 2007

Monday Roundup

News
The Rocky Mountain News' Bernie Lincicome writes that despite the "stain" of doping allegations on his accomplishment, Floyd Landis' amazing ride on Stage 17 of last year's Tour de France was till something to see and not forget.

The CyclingNews reckons that partly because of Floyd Landis' absence from the TdF this year Christophe Moreau may have a chance at winning the big race.


VeloNews Monday EuroFile notes that Oscar Pereiro has had one hell of a year not knowing IF he will be declared winner of last summer's Tour de France, not to mention having had all the fun a winner would experience taken from him due to various circumstances. But, he is not the only one with problems, the UCI called an emergency meeting this afternoon to discuss abnormal readings from samples submitted by several top riders after the Giro D'Italia. The riders showed lower than normal readings of a hormone and thus their specimens were flagged. They include winner Danilo Di Luca:

Officials from Italy's national Olympic Committee requested an emergency meeting with UCI president Pat McQuaid in an effort to secure data from the governing body's on-going longitudinal medical monitoring of the riders in question.

A CONI spokesman said the agency wants to compare those values to the results of the Giro samples.

"The results are of concern, because all four show hormone levels that are not normal for adult males," the spokesman said. "These results would be more likely to have come from a child rather than a fully mature adult. The fact that four men all produce such results on the same day is extremely bizarre."


The Guardian (UK) headlines Landis as saying, "What people think of me is meaningless" in a fair article that make him sound like he's considering retirement.

"Before all of this happened I used to put more energy and time into caring what people thought about me but the truth is I'm not going to convince everybody," he says. "What people think of me personally is meaningless at this stage. They can think what they like. All I care about now is that the next guy who comes along gets the chance to defend himself. As the system stands, an accused person has no chance of proving he is innocent."

Bicycle Retailer
via Daily Spin notes

In Floyd Landis' new book, "Positively False," the embattled 2006 Tour de France winner saves his harshest words for the World Anti-Doping Agency and USADA, its U.S. counterpart, according to a recent USA Today story.

“USADA brought in LeMond because they couldn’t prove the case on scientific grounds,” said Landis, in an exclusive interview with USA Today. “It was like the weapons of mass destruction [in Iraq]. If you look behind what they said, there is no evidence. They just had to make something up.”

“Positively False” goes on sale tomorrow.


Blogs
Dugard tells us how he plans to blog during his coverage of the Tour de France this year, and he notes that Floyd Landis, 2006 TdF champion, will be somewhere between here and there promoting his book "Positively False".

Rant had his patience tested recently by incompetent airlines, but at the same time he had a great vacation. Now that he's back in the loop he sees all sorts of disturbing things have occurred since he left. Among them are, the Walsh book about Lance Armstrong, the UCI "pledge", and the "dopey" Men in Black allegations against riders who do not train in their usual team kits. All of this may make Rant want to go back on vacation, soon. In an update Rant wonders exactly what book Edward Wyatt of the NY Times read when he commented on alleged contradictions found in "Positively False".

Finger Food writes a lot about the Philles and whether they will be buying or selling this year. He also comments on his current obsession, Floyd Landis, who will be on the CBS Early Show tomorrow AM and Wednesday, and on Letterman tomorrow night. Now what's this about Led Zeppelin and Lancaster?

There is a reason Led Zeppelin never came to Lancaster and it has nothing to do with the fact there wasn’t a venue big enough to accommodate them…

Could it be... S A T A N ?

DBowen still doesn't know what to think, but has ordered both Positively False and Walsh's book.

WCSN's Greg Ruckman promises to talk about Landis in his next blog post. He's worried about doping at the Beijing Olympics, and likes orange Dutch recumbents in this one.

The Cyclist Blog has a couple of things wrong in this entry, one of which is that Oscar Pereiro has been given the TdF title, he has not.

Ransom Rides 100 will get to reviewing new books by Floyd Landis and David Walsh when he has time, he also intends to talk to another author who has even more to say about Lance Armstrong and doping.

Cycling Fans Anonymous points us to the Guardian piece above.

Guardian Blogs
has the same story, with comments that are on the fence, and frustrated.

Ransom Rides 100 promises book reviews next week, and an interview with David Walsh.

Mistress Electrica (not safe for work)in "Love Pumping" talks about "supersaturating blood with oxygen (sort of like Floyd Landis)" as a way of addressing impotence in clients. On this occasion, we'll pass the opportunity to post a corrective comment.

Absolutely Alex
runs over the Guardian article.

5 comments:

pensum said...

Hello everyone, seems things are getting quiet while everyone waits for the verdict, so in the meantime i recommend this rather interesting article mentioned by the folks over at The Science of Sport (who have written some very good posts these past days). the writer experimented with a drug regimen, not scientific i know but enlightening just the same.
http://outside.away.com/outside/bodywork/200311/200311_drug_test_1.html
"With drugs in the mix, it's not about the athletes, it's about the chemistry."

("Eightzero") said...

Can someone with the necessary medical background comment on these "bizarre" results from the Giro? Any clue what hormone they might be studying? I'm just afraid we're in for a "here comes the science" moment.

wschart said...

Just speculation, but in effect. Landis was busted because he epitestosterone (sp) was low, not because the testosterone level was high. Could this be the case here, with the authorities being a bit more cautious in their statements to avoid a "Poundism"?

Seamus said...

Hello I am the admin. of the cyclist blog and I would like to make my full apology for my blog post. I did not me to say the Oscar has won. I was try to show that if he had been award the title. I feel like Oscar himself falls within the gray area of doping.

Michael said...

I bought Floyd's book tonight and right next to it was Walsh's book. I read some of it, but what got me was that right on the inside cover, Walsh makes the statement that Landis was positive for a testerone level 11 times what it should have been. No mention of the Testerone to Epi ratio or the fact that Floyd's Testerone level was never over the limit. Great writing from a award winning journalist...

And from what little I read, everything he states is construed to make Armstrong look guilty. The whole book appears to be he said/she said.