News, Research and Commentary about the Floyd Landis doping allegations.
CLOSED 31-DEC-2008
.
.
.
One of TBV's sons gives Landis a "thumbs up" at the Tour of California, February 21, 2006 -- before things got complicated.
full size image/full image
Following up our earlier poke around, sources tell us the following:
Posted by DBrower at 2/26/2007 08:13:00 PM
What was a daily roundup became an "irregular report" of links with specific Landis interest, with brief comment. We avoided bashing, gushing, or gross stupidity. Unless it was funny.
We're still around for mail, but don't expect much or quick response. Thanks!
Comments are welcome, but may be edited/moderated or deleted for propriety and relevance. The decision of the judges is final. Your milage may vary, taxes and license additional.
"As always, Trust but Verify has the best coverage, if you want to delve into it." (Doucheblog)
"Floyd Landis: Blog on Landis Doping Allegations" (LA Times [better than nothing])
Total Poindexter Website Prize: to the fabulous geniuses over at trustbutverify, who not only are perhaps the most impassioned defenders of Floyd Landis' virtue beyond only the boy himself, but actually seem to understand the detailed scientific arguments they put out that the rest of us (well, me) are too stupid to even coherently summarize. Floyd, you better be innocent, or you owe these folks a *major* freakin' apology! (racejunkie)
"TalkingpointsBeforeVeracity " (Will@topix, our #1 fan)
"For another solid synopsis of the latest developments check out the always trenchant Trust But Verify site." (JohnnyBaseball)"For more in-depth daily coverage, go to trustbut.blogspot.com)." (Martin Dugard, author of Chasing Lance)
"Who does awards for blogs? I sense a nomination is in order." (Carlton Reid, of BikeBiz)
"Hands-down champion of full-and I mean full-coverage of this hearing is the blog Trust But Verify. You'll have to have excellent background knowledge of the issues, and wade through page after page of detail to get to anything interesting, but it's raw and unfiltered and all there. The guy who runs the site, a cycling fan from Northern California, began casually providing a clearinghouse for Landis case news nearly 10 months ago, and now he has the haunted look of a man whose life has been hijacked and wants it back. (Loren Mooney, co-author of Positively False, at Bicycling)"thank you for you balanced look at what is happening with floyd." (Michael Farrington. Green Mountain Cyclery, Ephata, PA.)
"This genuine Floyd basher would like to thank you for the hard work you put into this great resource." (Spinopsys Phil)
" Trust but Verify, the essential clearinghouse blog about the Landis case" (Mark McClusky of Wired magazine)
"if you want the latest news on the Floyd Landis case, Trust but Verify is the go-to site. The author is biased in favor of Floyd (so am I) but the reporting is neutral and comprehensive." (12string musings)"Great blog. You're tagged. " (BikingBis. Great, more work)
[More...]Thanks to Free Floyd for the idea, and Groklaw for some inspiration.
PK/Strbuk is similarly inclined.Bill Hue is a passionate about fairness and justice, and is relatively indifferent to Landis' guilt or innocence
Marc is an American living in Paris.
If someone who leans towards guilt would like to contribute directly, please inform us.
Sharing a diversity of viewpoints is the best way we know of to arrive at the truth.
1 comments:
This situation sounds similar to what I've witnessed many times in my work.
Engineering is developing a new product and sales/marketing promise it to customers by a certain date. As usual engineering is running behind schedule and the product is not going to be released on time, but some customers have a hard deadline (in the US governmental agencies often have to use or lose their funding by the end the year), so something has to be shipped to them. To meet the deadline the customer is shipped a "beta" unit and told that he will have to update the firmware when it is finally released. Engineering finishes the development and the released firmware is sent out to the early customers, but whether or not it gets installed is a coin toss.
The Isochrom and Isoprime must be nearly identical or the firmware from one wouldn't work at all in the other. But still there must be differences that are very much worth looking in to.
Hopefully GV is cooperative with Floyd's team, and they still have engineers around who worked on the development these instruments, and they still have the source code and/or bug reports for the old firmware. But I doubt they'd be willing to cross the anti-doping agencies by cooperating with Landis. Surely the arbitration panel has no power to force GV to do anything, do they?
Did all the info about the test instruments come from the lab data packs? If not, I wonder where it is coming from? Maybe Floyd has a backer at GV or even inside the LNDD.
~ Cub (Mr. Obvious)
Post a Comment