tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post7712575930168700030..comments2023-10-06T03:21:26.130-07:00Comments on trust but verify: Hearing Tuesday - BrennaDBrowerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17718913310467614671noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-18356095228039738152007-05-15T11:46:00.000-07:002007-05-15T11:46:00.000-07:00Just another reader that wants to say we're all gr...Just another reader that wants to say we're all grateful for these summaries!!! THANK YOU!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-81665019315251777062007-05-15T11:30:00.000-07:002007-05-15T11:30:00.000-07:00Regarding my 11:19 post, of course I mean "come do...Regarding my 11:19 post, of course I mean "come down" as in get closer to zero (which is actually going up, of course).<BR/><BR/>syiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-16231231585519099722007-05-15T11:23:00.000-07:002007-05-15T11:23:00.000-07:00lm loosing the video now.. but it comes and goes, ...lm loosing the video now.. but it comes and goes, but dont wanna shut it down, better than nothing l guess..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-29071010787821249202007-05-15T11:19:00.000-07:002007-05-15T11:19:00.000-07:00Hey Duck,So are you saying the -6.? for 5a for S17...Hey Duck,<BR/><BR/>So are you saying the -6.? for 5a for S17 could come down pretty far upon reprocessing? Is this "reprocessing" mean re-doing the numbers with different software?<BR/><BR/>syiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-64698108554219305102007-05-15T11:15:00.000-07:002007-05-15T11:15:00.000-07:00Thank you to TBV for the coverage! It's by far the...Thank you to TBV for the coverage! It's by far the most reliable for near immediate info on the hearing.<BR/><BR/>Yesterday's log ins do not work today. I'm fairly certain paying Courtroom View Network $100 per day will not yeild reliable viewing of the hearing. Their archives from yesterday's segment of the hearing are currently max-ed out and there is a message to try later. <BR/><BR/>Jim T was smart to keep the page open from yesterday to avoid the log-in problems of today.<BR/><BR/>Thanks again for the great work TBV.<BR/><BR/>Jeff from Newark, DEAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-89218176143452478882007-05-15T10:58:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:58:00.000-07:00Anon 10:44I had the page open from yesterday, so I...Anon 10:44<BR/><BR/>I had the page open from yesterday, so I didn't need to log in.<BR/><BR/>Jim TAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-84875644968334428842007-05-15T10:56:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:56:00.000-07:00poor Stephanie!thanks for the update, pommi.poor Stephanie!<BR/><BR/>thanks for the update, pommi.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-7777500496622852642007-05-15T10:45:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:45:00.000-07:00DPF Update from Vaughn, dated 10:29am:"I received ...DPF Update from Vaughn, dated 10:29am:<BR/><BR/>"I received this message about 1/2 hour ago, It looks like our server "Stephanie" is getting a heart transplant and is in surgery at the moment.<BR/>We will in all likelihood lose a few hours of messages back to the latest backup.<BR/>Sorry for the inconvenience.<BR/>Vaughn<BR/>Dear Customer,<BR/>Today_s problems with the Stephanie server will be resolved shortly. Technicians have been working to resolve the problem, and a decision was made to replace the hard-drives entirely as a future precaution.<BR/>The new hard-drives will be restored from a backup taken at 4am this morning.<BR/>We would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused by the downtime today.<BR/>Best Regards,"Pommihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07224938704426106934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-64428743107239866322007-05-15T10:44:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:44:00.000-07:00How did you login, Jim T?How did you login, Jim T?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-42865749889765622262007-05-15T10:43:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:43:00.000-07:00I just kept the CVN window open after yesterday, a...I just kept the CVN window open after yesterday, and it just started to play it..<BR/>now the audio is alsi kicking in, maybe you log in also now from floyds addressAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-52961004440868074712007-05-15T10:41:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:41:00.000-07:00Purpose of WADA is to standardize criteria, not th...Purpose of WADA is to standardize criteria, not the lab.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-76549748838533812502007-05-15T10:40:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:40:00.000-07:00whoever managed to link in (even with crackly audi...whoever managed to link in (even with crackly audio), how'd you do it???<BR/><BR/>not that TBV isn't doing a brilliant job, it's just that i want to see this!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-79382668579555143612007-05-15T10:39:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:39:00.000-07:00Please don't forget the urine blank that, when rep...Please don't forget the urine blank that, when reprocessed, turned up one metabolite positive. Or the sample that went from -3.65 down to 1.61 on reprocessing. Seems pretty clear where he falls on the inclusion of IRMS uncertainty.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-91723354728475759212007-05-15T10:38:00.001-07:002007-05-15T10:38:00.001-07:00Anon 10:34, why do you say 4 should be a standard ...Anon 10:34, why do you say 4 should be a standard for all labs? I though each lab was able to set its own criteria, as long as they were able to explain scientifically why they set that criteria. Is that not right?<BR/><BR/>Anyway, the stage 17 5a is still way over 4. Or, rather, way under -4.<BR/><BR/>syiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-57146000321446328582007-05-15T10:38:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:38:00.000-07:00I get audio and video, but don't get the slides to...I get audio and video, but don't get the slides to show. Anyone else having this problem?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-32051896428936821192007-05-15T10:34:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:34:00.000-07:00That would be arguing the science. Can't do that....That would be arguing the science. Can't do that.<BR/><BR/>Better course is to argue the standard is 4 metolbolities at UCLA/Australia becuase that is the actual standard. The LNDD changed the standard so they violating WADA rules.<BR/><BR/>If they can do this, they USADA has no case. It will be dismissed before Landis defense starts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-69305406238998613342007-05-15T10:32:00.002-07:002007-05-15T10:32:00.002-07:00It will be interesting if they don't even try to c...It will be interesting if they don't even try to claim that they have the original data.<BR/><BR/>What I don't get about this line of attack is why we don't see computer experts on the witness lists. Are there more witness lists to come? Have we just not got there yet?<BR/><BR/>syiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-57813327672263651392007-05-15T10:32:00.001-07:002007-05-15T10:32:00.001-07:00Brenna just said the lab re-ran the results and ov...<I>Brenna just said the lab re-ran the results and overwrote the original files. So the first run is gone. Not good for USADA</I><BR/><BR/>Sigh. This case should be thrown out right now and LNDD decertified immediately. This is just crap. What did they do, run tests until they got the result Dick Pound ordered them to get?<BR/><BR/>I'm getting seriously cynical about these people.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09761649488198090733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-84749353879090256062007-05-15T10:32:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:32:00.000-07:00l can see the video ok, but the audio is cracking ...l can see the video ok, but the audio is cracking down all the time..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-33480634811038896282007-05-15T10:30:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:30:00.000-07:00Yes, but I think they are going to have come up wi...Yes, but I think they are going to have come up with a real REASON just 5A is not enough - like demonstrate a certain percentage of false positives when just 5A is high.<BR/><BR/>syiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-90396830788587044612007-05-15T10:26:00.001-07:002007-05-15T10:26:00.001-07:00It sounds like the re-processing of the raw data u...It sounds like the re-processing of the raw data using different modes of the old software and the new software has created a real rat's nest of numbers such that they call into question the capability for consistent, repeatable results. USADA is hanging their hat on the fact that the 5a-diol numbers were consistently over the 3-delta threshold. I suspect there will be a separate line of attack on the 5a-diol numbers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-39551973069946416482007-05-15T10:26:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:26:00.000-07:00Brenna just said the lab re-ran the results and ov...Brenna just said the lab re-ran the results and overwrote the original files. So the first run is gone. Not good for USADA!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-8978849791461964902007-05-15T10:18:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:18:00.000-07:00Not just from a numerical sense, also shows that t...Not just from a numerical sense, also shows that the rules are somewhat arbritary. USADA's expert does not seem to agree witht he lab's standard<BR/><BR/>Makes the Ayotte's testimony critical. If they can cast doubt on the metobolite(s) argument, then can then say 5A only is not enough.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-64055749494706105002007-05-15T10:14:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:14:00.000-07:00There was a lot of argument on DPF over the months...There was a lot of argument on DPF over the months about whether the limit should be a flat 3.0, or if you should add the .8 uncertainty. If this guy this it should be 3.8 that helps Floyd a little.<BR/><BR/>syiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-43071317196560500492007-05-15T10:11:00.000-07:002007-05-15T10:11:00.000-07:00Am I reading this correctly, it sounds like Suh is...Am I reading this correctly, it sounds like Suh is making Brenna look bad.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com