tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post7643720586204418703..comments2023-10-06T03:21:26.130-07:00Comments on trust but verify: Monday RoundupDBrowerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17718913310467614671noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-32930399722162254892008-06-23T11:24:00.000-07:002008-06-23T11:24:00.000-07:00The CyclingWeekly column has an interesting note:"...The CyclingWeekly column has an interesting note:<BR/><BR/>"Two more dates to add to your diary on the anti-doping front: apparently this week is the last that positive dope tests from the 2008 Tour of Italy can be made public."<BR/><BR/>I didn't know there was an associated statute of limitations. Anyone know what they are talking about?<BR/><BR/>One thing I have sort of lost sight of: in awaiting the decision of the CAS, it is easy to forget this really isn't a "court" much as their title seems to imply this. The latter part is far more descriptive. They are *arbitrators.* As such, it is at least possible they will try to split the baby. We could see a decision like "yeah, the testing sucks, and it doesn't really prove Floyd doped. But it's the best we have, so he's a doper, since dopers are people that fail tests, not who actually dope." After the Petacchi decision, I think anything is possible.Eightzerohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02326301095221867947noreply@blogger.com