tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post6265064539999198878..comments2023-10-06T03:21:26.130-07:00Comments on trust but verify: Hue - Impressions From the Hearing RoomDBrowerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17718913310467614671noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-31185204863649045282007-05-15T13:39:00.000-07:002007-05-15T13:39:00.000-07:00Joe,Thanks for the correction on the water issue. ...Joe,Thanks for the correction on the water issue. We are literally flying by the seat of our pants here and appreciate the help.<BR/><BR/>anon 1:06<BR/>The French chicks are marginally hot but I'm 50 and everything looks good to me.<BR/><BR/>Cal,<BR/>You are right on point with your obsevations.<BR/>BillLaura Challoner, DVMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00606828463436614790noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-77052116069704647132007-05-15T13:30:00.000-07:002007-05-15T13:30:00.000-07:00Hey PC, I don't understand how the panel's expert ...Hey PC, I don't understand how the panel's expert can be considered "independent" when he comes from a WADA lab. That is so ridiculous! By WADA rule, he's not even allowed to say or do anything that could help Landis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-27292519010759811912007-05-15T13:17:00.000-07:002007-05-15T13:17:00.000-07:00Bill,Just to be ‘accurate’ Aquafina is bottled and...Bill,<BR/><BR/>Just to be ‘accurate’ Aquafina is bottled and distributed by Pepsi. (I’m in advertising and I have worked on the brand) Dasani is bottled and distributed by Coke. <BR/><BR/>HOWEVER Lance Armstrong was sponsored by Dasani for awhile! It makes you wonder. (Not really) <BR/><BR/>JoeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-60644069313487729452007-05-15T13:11:00.000-07:002007-05-15T13:11:00.000-07:00Cal, Good observation. USADA seems to be using...Cal,<BR/> Good observation. USADA seems to be using a number of witnesses who do not have experience testifying - probably due to the scientific niche involved - and the high power (expensive) attorney brought in by USADA does not seem to have prepared them well.<BR/><BR/> Good points are being made, but there are at least two problems. One is how open the majority of the panel is to them. The second is whether or not they are going to consult their "independent expert" on the points being made by Landis' team.<BR/>pcrosbyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-27698982652926598822007-05-15T13:06:00.000-07:002007-05-15T13:06:00.000-07:00Those of us without connection are dying to know, ...Those of us without connection are dying to know, are the French chicks hot?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-52601994046161593742007-05-15T12:51:00.000-07:002007-05-15T12:51:00.000-07:00Interesting observation. Realistically speaking, h...Interesting observation. Realistically speaking, how "open" are the arbitrators to the hearings?<BR/><BR/>The cynic in me says that they already made their decision long before this hearing started.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-54509672080033262202007-05-15T12:44:00.000-07:002007-05-15T12:44:00.000-07:00Bill,I was intrigued by Suh's cross. I thought it ...Bill,<BR/><BR/>I was intrigued by Suh's cross. I thought it was masterful. He also got Brenna to basically look like a stooge for being unwilling to state that .8 uncertainty should be on top of the -3 delta unit. He stated that and then when he realized it was counter to USADA's position, he was unwilling to admit what he thought. I think not being able to depose witnesses may have been helpful to Landis in this case. Had he (Brenna) been aware this would be part of the questioning, he may have thought of a better way to position himself in regard to this matter. I thought he looked like someone trying to avoid answering the question after he already answered it. What was your impression on this point?<BR/><BR/>CalAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com