tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post4648920923395596164..comments2023-10-06T03:21:26.130-07:00Comments on trust but verify: CAS InformationDBrowerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17718913310467614671noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-45208008320850563172007-10-13T13:00:00.000-07:002007-10-13T13:00:00.000-07:00TBVThanks for the insight. Hadn't put that togethe...TBV<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the insight. Hadn't put that together. While the personnel issue was touched on briefly in the May hearing, I didn't get a strong opinion that overlap happened. Did you?<BR/><BR/>Ken@GV - Thanks for asking the George Soros Foundation. It was a long shot, but not really their cup of tea.GMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13827404930085676519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-83106999313673264542007-10-13T07:54:00.000-07:002007-10-13T07:54:00.000-07:00This is the most promising information that I have...This is the most promising information that I have seen yet. I heard from John Eustice yesterday that the George Soros foundation will not be of assistance.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07586627433830934980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-32318663092569343402007-10-12T19:43:00.000-07:002007-10-12T19:43:00.000-07:00landaluze overlapped the landis case, and the lab ...landaluze overlapped the landis case, and the lab work had already been done when the decision was announced. There was no chance for lnds to fix anything. Tjisiw why despite saying they hadall the evidencethey needed and were ready to go in early December, usafa in January wanted the other b samples tested. They couldthen be corrobarative evidence even if there was a landaluze problem with the s17 tests<BR/><BR/>-dBDBrowerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17718913310467614671noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-64663455052866052412007-10-12T13:45:00.000-07:002007-10-12T13:45:00.000-07:00......and caused others to have to spend a lot of .........and caused others to have to spend a lot of money in the process of defending themselves against the declared results of shoddy work..........Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09427604865634964926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-74095451918792136682007-10-12T08:18:00.000-07:002007-10-12T08:18:00.000-07:00One would think that after Landaluze's acquittal L...One would think that after Landaluze's acquittal LNDD would have gotten their act together in following established procedures.<BR/>It begs the question of how much longer can WADA (and other governing bodies) defend LNDD's shoddy work? Not only has WADA and USADA lost credibility in doing so, but they've also spent a lot of money in the process.cthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10872360042085191833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-16117661411401880762007-10-11T11:37:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:37:00.000-07:00Thanks Bill, can't believe I missed that great art...Thanks Bill, can't believe I missed that great article.<BR/><BR/>strstrbukhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00814462555882571936noreply@blogger.com