tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post1811971783802194784..comments2023-10-06T03:21:26.130-07:00Comments on trust but verify: Early Monday RoundupDBrowerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17718913310467614671noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-18279000219450080902007-05-21T07:09:00.000-07:002007-05-21T07:09:00.000-07:00By chance...do you have any stats on how many peop...By chance...do you have any stats on how many people have been watching the internet courtroom sessions? Was there a large spike when Floyd took the stand?<BR/><BR/>~PaulAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-77990331792766815192007-05-21T07:05:00.000-07:002007-05-21T07:05:00.000-07:00Just have the felling that no one will win in this...Just have the felling that no one will win in this case. True, it will (should) have far-reaching ramifications on testing methods/protocol/procedures but everyone is dragged through the mud. <BR/>Floyd will lose on a 2-1 and may not race again (if he took vountary suspension last July then he's banked a year of suspension already so could be back in 2008 but may just be too bitter - he's voiced always that he hates the system - UCI and WADA). <BR/>USADA/WADA will have to reform (thank god there's a Presidency change coming because it never would happen with Pound at the helm).<BR/><BR/>Lemond is forced to admit something extremely personal in public and Joe Papp gets absolutely scorched (he was a low-level pro (why everyone keeps saying mid-level is beyond me), he fessed up for USADA and they still gave him the same 2-year suspension he would've got if he hadn't played witness, plus he opened himself up to a lot more punishment.<BR/><BR/>While interesting to see this process, it's all very sad and no one wins (except the lawyers and witnesses getting paid by the hour!)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31819641.post-60817848372146615382007-05-21T06:37:00.000-07:002007-05-21T06:37:00.000-07:00I didn't realize that LeMond didn't answer any of ...I didn't realize that LeMond didn't answer any of the defense's questions.<BR/><BR/>Wouldn't that make his testimony, moot?<BR/><BR/>How come the USADA hasn't focused 100% on the science to prove that Landis is guilty? That's the big question mark for me. <BR/><BR/>I guess they know a 'guilty' when they see it....Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05043995499810157859noreply@blogger.com